- Past Construction Ltd. v. Past et al, 2003 BCSC 1185
Counsel for the company in an action in which a wife and husband, in the context of a matrimonial action, both claimed against the company for relief under the oppression remedy section of the Company Act. The claims were dismissed against the company
Counsel for the Claimant in a claim alleging conduct that was oppressive or unfairly prejudicial to or that unfairly disregarded the interests of the Claimant as a shareholder. The Arbitrator found conduct unfairly prejudicial to and that unfairly disregarded the interests of the Claimant
- In the Matter of Elephant & Castle Group Inc. and in the Matter of Sections 111, 149 and 206 of the Company Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 62, as amended
Counsel for the applicant on a rectification order
- In the Matter of the Company Act R.S.B.C. 1996, chapter 62 and amendments thereto and In the Matter of 490575 British Columbia Ltd. and In the Matter of 98888 Investments Ltd. and In the Matter of Nova Bancorp Mortgage Corporation, September 2, 1998
Counsel for the applicant on a rectification order
- Counsel on a number of applications for interim and final orders in relation to arrangements
See for example: In the Matter of Gemco Software International Inc. involving Eagle Acquisition Canada Inc. and in the Matter of Section 288 of the Business Corporations Act, S.B.C. 2002, c. 57; In the Matter of Skye Resources Inc. involving Hudbay Minerals Inc. and 0828275 B.C. Ltd. and in the Matter of Section 288 of the Business Corporations Act, S.B.C. 2002, c. 57
- Attended as counsel at a number of contested company meetings