Skip to main content
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are agreeing to our use of cookies as described in our privacy policy.
Bulletin

SCC Denies Leave, Confirming Class Action Not The Right Choice For Aboriginal Rights Claim

Fasken
Reading Time 2 minute read
Subscribe

Aboriginal Law Bulletin

On November 15, 2012, the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave to appeal to Chief Robert Chamberlin, Chief of the Kwicksutaineuk/Ah-Kwa-Mish First Nation regarding a BC Court of Appeal decision, which denied certification of a class action based on Aboriginal rights. The BC Court of Appeal had overturned a BC Supreme Court decision certifying a class action regarding a claim for damages and declaratory relief associated with impacts on Aboriginal Rights from the regulation of aquaculture in the Broughton Archipelago. In Kwicksutaineuk/Ah-Kwa-Mish First Nation v. Canada (Attorney General), 2012 BCCA 193, the BC Court of Appeal allowed the appeal holding that the BC Class Proceedings Act cannot be used to pursue these collective rights.

Andrew Borrell and Kevin O’Callaghan of Fasken Martineau’s Vancouver office acted as counsel for the Intervenor, BC Salmon Farmers Association, on the hearing of the case before the BC Court of Appeal.

It should be emphasized that although this decision stands for the proposition that an Aboriginal collective is not capable on its own of starting an action in the same way as an individual, that does not mean that there is any impediment to bringing claims of Aboriginal rights and title to the Courts. Aboriginal collectives can, and have been encouraged to, use representative actions in which one member of the group stands as the representative plaintiff for the remainder of the group. As a result, there is a process to get these issues before the courts.

View our earlier Bulletin on Kwicksutaineuk/Ah-Kwa-Mish First Nation v. Canada (Attorney General), 2012 BCCA 193.

    Subscribe

    Receive email updates from our team

    Subscribe