Skip to main content
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are agreeing to our use of cookies as described in our privacy policy.
Bulletin

Income-Splitting Loans

Fasken
Reading Time 2 minute read Subscribe

Estate Planning Bulletin

The Canada Revenue Agency (the "CRA") has announced the 2013 second quarter prescribed interest rate used to calculate taxable benefits for employees and shareholders for interest-free and low-interest loans would be 1%.  With this the lowest historical prescribed rate ever, many clients may be candidates for an income-splitting structure using non-arm's-length loans.

Under the Income Tax Act (the "Act") many income-splitting arrangements are no longer available.  There are, however, certain structures that are still open for use.  For instance, it is open for one spouse to loan funds to the other spouse to make an investment.  In order for attribution to be avoided, with respect to both income and capital gains earned on the lent property or property substituted therefore, interest must be charged on the loan at the prescribed rate in effect at the time the loan is made, and this rate must apply for the entire term of the loan.  In addition, the interest must be paid no later than January 30th following the end of a calendar year, and there can be no defaults in the payment of interest for any year.

With the prescribed rate to be 1%, there is an opportunity here for income splitting on the assumption that the property substituted for the lent property earns income and realized capital gains in excess of the prescribed rate of interest that must be paid to the lending spouse.  It is important to note that, in order for this strategy to be effective, the requirements with respect to the payment of interest must be satisfied each year.  If there is a failure to pay interest in one year, there is no means to correct this error and attribution will result in subsequent years.

Finally, other permutations of this income-splitting structure can be devised, such as a loan to a discretionary family trust, the beneficiaries of which include minor children. Where minor children are beneficiaries of a discretionary family trust, it is possible to still have significant tax savings to the extent capital gains are realized and paid to a minor beneficiary.  In this situation, there is no attribution of the realized capital gains to the lending parent.

The savings from this strategy could be significant, particularly given the interest rate on the loan will remain locked in at the 1% prescribed rate.

For more information, please contact the author, or any of the other members of our Estate Planning group.

    Subscribe

    Receive email updates from our team

    Subscribe