Skip to main content

PLEASE NOTE: For everyone’s safety, Fasken recommends anyone on-site at our Canadian offices be familiar with the COVID-19 recommendations in place which may include one or more of the following: social distancing, hand sanitizing, wearing a mask in common areas and proof of full vaccination. These measures apply to lawyers, staff, clients, service providers and other visitors.

Client Work

Heilman v. First Canada (No. 3), 2011 BCHRT 260

Fasken
Reading Time 1 minute read Subscribe

Overview

Client

Confidential Client

In this decision, the Human Rights Tribunal awarded costs for improper conduct on the part of the complainant after the complainant continued to make inappropriate comments in his submissions, using inflammatory, derogatory, disrespectful language after being warned by the Tribunal to cease and desist from doing so. Link to decision:  Heilman v. First Canada (No. 3), 2011 BCHRT 260

Team

    Sign up for updates from this team

    Receive email updates from our team

    Subscribe