Skip to main content
PLEASE NOTE: For everyone’s safety, Fasken requires anyone on-site at our Canadian and Johannesburg offices to provide proof of full vaccination against COVID-19. This applies to lawyers, staff, clients, service providers and other visitors.
Client Work

Heilman v. First Canada (No. 3), 2011 BCHRT 260

Reading Time 1 minute read Subscribe



Confidential Client

In this decision, the Human Rights Tribunal awarded costs for improper conduct on the part of the complainant after the complainant continued to make inappropriate comments in his submissions, using inflammatory, derogatory, disrespectful language after being warned by the Tribunal to cease and desist from doing so. Link to decision:  Heilman v. First Canada (No. 3), 2011 BCHRT 260


    Sign up for updates from this team

    Receive email updates from our team