Skip to main content
Experience

R. v. Jones, 2017 SCC 60

Fasken
Reading Time 1 minute read
Share
  • LinkedIn

Overview

Client

Tristin Jones

R. v. Jones, 2017 SCC 60
Fasken helped establish new law in Canada when it comes to the expectation of privacy for electronic text message communication. Fasken counsel, Patrick McCann, argued successfully before the Supreme Court of Canada that the privacy interests in text messages resides in the content of the communication and not where it is taken from. Representing Tristin Jones in R v. Jones, Patrick, assisted by Fasken partner Peter Mantas and Ewan Lyttle of Lyttle McGarry and Del Greco LLP, was able to establish that everyone has an inherent privacy interest in their own text messages. The Court agreed that electronic text message communication provides the sender with standing to challenge the seizure under the Charter. In this digital age, and as we all become dependent on our mobile phones, these matters will occur more frequently.

Team

  • Patrick F.D. McCann, Counsel | White Collar Defence and Investigations, Ottawa, ON, +1 613 696 6906, [email protected]
  • Peter N. Mantas, Partner | Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Leader, Procurement and Government Contracts, Ottawa, ON | London, +1 613 696 6886, [email protected]
Patrick McCann Ottawa Lawyer Patrick F.D. McCann Counsel | White Collar Defence and Investigations Ottawa, ON +1 613 696 6906
Peter Mantas Ottawa Lawyer Peter N. Mantas Partner | Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Leader, Procurement and Government Contracts Ottawa, ON London +1 613 696 6886
+44 20 7917 8519