Skip to main content
Experience

Cook companies resolve class action concerning inferior vena cava filter products

Fasken
Reading Time 2 minute read
Share
  • LinkedIn

Overview

Client

The Defendants, Cook (Canada) Inc., Cook Incorporated, and William Cook Europe APS (collectively, “Cook”)

A Fasken team comprising Sarah Armstrong, Paul Martin, Robin Roddey, David Ziegler, and Tina Cody represented Cook (Canada) Inc., Cook Incorporated, and William Cook Europe APS (together, “Cook”) in a series of Canadian class action lawsuits concerning inferior vena cava (“IVC”) filters manufactured and sold by Cook.

In Kuiper v. Cook (Canada) Inc., the Ontario proceeding, the plaintiffs moved to certify a class of all persons in Canada who had a Cook IVC filter placed. The plaintiffs claimed: pecuniary and special damages of $500,000 for each person who had a Cook IVC filter placed; $100,000 for each claimant under the Family Law Act or similar legislation; and punitive damages of $20 million; a total estimated liability of more than $11.5 billion. On the certification motion, the plaintiffs, represented by a consortium of plaintiff firms, advanced two principal negligence claims, namely: that Cook’s IVC filters were unreasonably dangerous and defective in design; and that Cook did not provide adequate warnings so as to allow the IVC filters to be used safely.

Ultimately, the motion judge held that the plaintiffs failed to plead the material facts necessary to constitute a reasonable cause of action for design negligence, which defect was plain and obvious, and thus failed to satisfy section 5(1)(a) of the Class Proceedings Act, 1992 (“CPA”). The motion judge further held that the plaintiffs failed to adduce any evidence to establish that there were genuine common issues arising from any of the alleged design defects, and thus failed to satisfy section 5(1)(c) of the CPA. These findings were upheld on appeal to the Divisional Court, which certified the action on a limited set of issues regarding negligent failure to warn.

In the result, what was a $11.5 billion proposed class action alleging all manner of design defect against Cook’s IVC filters was reduced to a class action on the narrow issue of whether Cook failed to warn physicians of certain risks associated with its IVC filters. Cook denies these allegations.

In May 2024, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice approved the settlement of the certified class action. 

Jurisdiction

  • Ontario

Team

  • Sarah J. Armstrong, Partner | Litigation and Dispute Resolution, Toronto, ON, +1 416 868 3452, [email protected]
  • Paul J. Martin, Partner | Litigation and Dispute Resolution, Toronto, ON, +1 416 865 4439, [email protected]
  • Robin P. Roddey, Partner | Litigation and Dispute Resolution, Toronto, ON, +1 416 865 4473, [email protected]
  • David A. Ziegler, Partner | Litigation and Dispute Resolution, Toronto, ON, +1 416 865 4516, [email protected]
  • Tina Cody, Associate | Litigation and Dispute Resolution, Toronto, ON, +1 416 865 4353, [email protected]
Sarah Armstrong Toronto Lawyer Sarah J. Armstrong Partner | Litigation and Dispute Resolution Toronto, ON +1 416 868 3452
Paul Martin Toronto Lawyer Paul J. Martin Partner | Litigation and Dispute Resolution Toronto, ON +1 416 865 4439
Robin P Roddey Toronto Lawyer Robin P. Roddey Partner | Litigation and Dispute Resolution Toronto, ON +1 416 865 4473
David Ziegler Toronto Lawyer David A. Ziegler Partner | Litigation and Dispute Resolution Toronto, ON +1 416 865 4516
Tina Cody Toronto Lawyer Tina Cody Associate | Litigation and Dispute Resolution Toronto, ON +1 416 865 4353