Skip to main content

Copyrights


Copyright guidance covering protection, licensing, regulatory compliance, and enforcement in Canada and internationally.
When IP disputes threaten innovation, revenue, or market position, Fasken helps clients enforce rights and defend claims through strategic litigation, arbitration, mediation, and regulatory proceedings in Canada and internationally.
Subscribe Fasken
Share
  • LinkedIn

Overview

Copyright is both a legal right and a commercial tool. Organizations rely on it to protect innovation, monetize content, manage risk, and operate confidently in digital and global markets. Fasken advises copyright owners and users on protection strategies, licensing, regulatory compliance, and enforcement—helping clients make informed decisions that support growth and long‑term value.

Copyright in a Complex and Evolving Landscape

Copyright law is rapidly evolving in response to digital distribution, platform‑based business models, artificial intelligence, and increased regulatory oversight. Businesses must manage overlapping considerations, including licensing frameworks, collective rights administration, compliance with statutory regimes, and the risk of infringement claims.

Fasken supports clients across creative, technology, and research‑driven industries, providing strategic advice that balances protection, use, and enforcement of copyright in Canada and internationally.

What You Can Expect

  • Business‑oriented copyright advice aligned with commercial objectives
  • Strategic guidance on ownership, licensing, liability, and content use
  • Clear analysis of risk in digital and technology‑driven environments
  • Practical support in high‑stakes disputes and regulatory proceedings
  • Integrated advice across IP, regulatory, litigation, and commercial matters

Who We Serve

Technology and Software Companies — Businesses developing software, platforms, games, and AI‑enabled products that rely on copyright protection and licensing.

Media, Entertainment, and Creative — Industries Clients operating in music, film, television, publishing, and interactive media.

Institutions and Content Users — Organizations, platforms, and businesses that rely on third‑party content and need to manage compliance, licensing, and risk.

Content Creators and Rights Holders — Artists, producers, publishers, developers, and organizations seeking to protect and monetize original works.

Types of Matters We Handle

Regulatory and Collective Rights Matters: Proceedings before the Copyright Board of Canada, tariff and royalty disputes, and compliance with statutory regimes, including notice‑and‑notice obligations

Copyright Strategy and Protection: Ownership and risk analysis, registration strategies, chain‑of‑title review, and portfolio management.

Licensing and Commercialization: Music licensing and clearance, film and television licensing agreements, software and SaaS agreements, content distribution, and commercialization arrangements.

Technology, Data, and AI‑Related Copyright Issues: Copyright considerations in software, videogames, digital platforms, and AI‑generated or AI‑assisted works.

Enforcement and Dispute Resolution: Copyright infringement litigation, defence against claims, anti‑trolling strategies, and appellate advocacy, including matters before the Supreme Court of Canada.

Cross‑Border Copyright Issues: Coordination of international copyright protection, enforcement, and regulatory alignment.

Why Clients Choose Fasken

Clients choose Fasken for copyright advice that combines legal depth with commercial judgment and technical expertise. We understand how copyright operates in real business environments and tailor our guidance to support innovation, monetization, and risk management.

Fasken’s copyright practice is consistently recognized by independent legal directories and industry publications, reflecting sustained involvement in complex copyright matters, including regulatory proceedings and precedent‑setting litigation.

What Success Looks Like

Copyright Board Proceedings: Represented clients in high‑stakes tariff and arbitration proceedings before the Copyright Board of Canada, helping shape royalty frameworks and commercial outcomes.

Software and Technology Licensing: Advised a technology company on copyright ownership, licensing, and compliance for a complex software and SaaS offering.

Copyright Enforcement: Acted for rights holders in infringement proceedings, including matters that advanced to Canada’s highest courts.

Creative Industry Transactions: Supported clients in music, film, and interactive media with licensing, clearance, and chain‑of‑title strategies.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q: Do you advise both copyright owners and users?
A:
Yes. We regularly act for rights holders, distributors, licensees and organizations that rely on third‑party content, helping manage protection, licensing, and risk.

Q: Can you help with Copyright Board proceedings?
A: Absolutely. Fasken has extensive experience before the Copyright Board of Canada in tariff‑setting and arbitration matters.

Q: Do you advise on copyright issues involving software and AI?
A: Yes. We support clients on copyright considerations related to software, digital platforms, streaming services, social media, videogames, and AI‑enabled technologies.

Q: Do you handle copyright litigation and appeals?
A: Yes. Our team has acted in leading copyright cases, including matters before the Supreme Court of Canada.

Your Team at Fasken

Clients work with an integrated copyright team that combines litigation strength, regulatory insight, and commercial IP experience. Our lawyers and advisors support clients across industries, technologies, and jurisdictions, bringing clarity and strategic judgment to complex copyright issues.

Clients value our ability to anticipate risk, coordinate across practice areas, and deliver practical advice that protects creative and technical assets while supporting long‑term business objectives.

Team

Primary Contact
  • Gerald (Jay) Kerr-Wilson, Partner | Trademark Agent | Intellectual Property, Ottawa, ON, +1 613 696 6884, [email protected]
Jay Kerr-Wilson Ottawa Lawyer Gerald (Jay) Kerr-Wilson Partner | Trademark Agent | Intellectual Property Ottawa, ON +1 613 696 6884

Experience

  • Canadian Education Consortium (The Council of Ministers of Education, Canada) successful in copyright royalty dispute at the Federal Court of Canada, [Case - A consortium of provincial and territorial education ministries and Ontario school boards], Consortium of provincial and territorial education ministries and Ontario school boards successful at the Federal Court.
  • CMRRA v. Apple et al and SOCAN v. Apple et al, [Case - Spotify and Bell Canada], FCA upholds Copyright Board decision to lower royalties paid for on-demand streaming and emphasizes importance of deference to expertise of Copyright Board
  • ESA v. SOCAN, 2020 FCA 100, [Case - Entertainment Software Association, Entertainment Software Association of Canada, Bell Canada, Google Canada, Quebecor Media, Rogers Communications and Shaw Communications], FCA overturns Copyright Board decision that recognized "making available" as an exclusive right, and would have required payment of double royalties for downloads.
  • Postmedia Network Inc. et al. v. Meltwater Holding B.V., et al. 2017 ONSC 3387, appealed 2017 ONSC 6036, [Case - The Halifax Herald Limited, Transcontinental Inc., Le Devoir Inc., and Cedrom-SNi Inc.], On October 12, 2017, Ontario Superior Court Justice Madam Justice J.T. Akbarali dismissed an appeal of a decision rendered May 31st in which Master Graham permitted the action to proceed pursuant to the plaintiffs’/respondents’ Rule 48.14 status hearing motion. The action is for substantial damag...
  • Interlocutory injunction against LaDose.pro and LaDose.ca, [Case - Applicants], We represented the applicants in an application for an interlocutory injunction against LaDose.pro and LaDose.ca. We obtained this injunction ordering two media monitoring websites to stop using or reproducing the copyrighted work belonging to the applicants.   This decision confirms the fact ...
  • Supreme Court of Canada Grants Leave in Copyright Technological Neutrality Case, [Deal - Canadian Broadcasting Corporation], On September 9, 2014, the Supreme Court of Canada granted the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation’s application for leave to appeal a decision of the Federal Court of Appeal which dealt with the application of technological neutrality to copyright licences in the broadcasting industry. The Supreme ...
  • Pelchat v. Astral Média et Zone3 inc. et al, [Case - Zone3], Pelchat, a very famous hair dresser, began presenting beauty makeover television shows for women in the 1970s, changing their hair, make-up and, afterwards, their clothing. About fifteen years later, Zone3, a well-known television production company in Québec, created and produced for Canal Vie (...
  • Provinces challenge the Copyright Board of Canada’s ability to set a tariff to be paid for the copying of literary works by government employees, [Deal - Confidential Clients], In this case, the governments of the provinces of Manitoba, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, and Saskatchewan challenged the Copyright Board of Canada’s ability to set a tariff to be paid for the copying of literary works by government employees. The provinces argued that there is a longstandin...
  • Alberta (Education) v. Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency (Access Copyright), 2012 SCC 37, [Case - Council of Ministries of Education of Canada], In this landmark decision, the Supreme Court recognized that copies of literary works that a teacher makes for the students in his or her class can be considered “fair dealing” and thus not infringe copyright. In doing so, the Court overturned the decisions of the Copyright Board of Canada and th...

Knowledge

  • AI and Copyright - Who owns AI-generated content?, 9/22/2025
  • AI and Copyright - AI-generated deepfakes and the law, 9/15/2025
  • AI and Copyright - Training AI with copyrighted material, 9/8/2025
  • Williams v Music and Entertainment Rights Licensing Independent Network Ltd and the Territorial Principle, 8/9/2024
  • Patent Term Adjustment is finally coming to Canada, 7/16/2024
  • Blacklock’s Reporter v Canada (Attorney General) and Password Sharing for Research Purposes, 6/26/2024
  • Copyright and Presentations: How to Avoid Presentation-Related Copyright Infringement, 4/30/2024
  • Alberta et al v Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency (Access Copyright), 2024 FC 292 and the Voluntary Copyright Tariff Regime, 4/26/2024
  • Doan v Clearview Inc and the Identification of Class Members, 2/5/2024
  • Voltage Holdings, LLC v Doe #1 and Evidentiary Requirements in Copyright Infringement, 2/1/2024

Events

News

  • Christian Leblanc analyzes the legal framework surrounding AI-generated artistic content in an interview broadcast on 98.5, 3/25/2026
  • Jay Kerr-Wilson comments on copyright protection in the video game industry on CBC News, 8/6/2025
  • Jay Kerr-Wilson comments on Québec’s new law aimed at accelerating the removal of non-consensual intimate images shared online on City News, 6/4/2025
  • Jay Kerr-Wilson comments on the lawsuit filed against OpenAI by Canadian media outlets in CBA National Magazine, 12/5/2024
  • Several publications quote Julie Desrosiers and Patricia Hénault in relation to a copyright lawsuit, 4/28/2021
  • Fourteen Fasken lawyers recognized as IP Stars by Managing Intellectual Property, 6/22/2020
  • The Wire Report quotes Jay Kerr-Wilson in an article about the notice-and-notice regime and copyright infringement, 3/13/2017
  • Abilk.com quotes Ariel Thomas in an article about Netflix copyright issues, 8/16/2016
  • The Hollywood Reporter quotes Ariel Thomas in an article about Netflix’s clampdown on users who use VPNs and proxy services to access the U.S. streaming service, 4/20/2016
  • CBC News quotes Ariel Thomas in an article on Android box devices promising television with no monthly bills, 2/22/2016

    Subscribe

    Receive email updates from our team about Intellectual Property