Skip to main content

PLEASE NOTE: For everyone’s safety, Fasken recommends anyone on-site at our Canadian offices be familiar with the COVID-19 recommendations in place which may include one or more of the following: social distancing, hand sanitizing, wearing a mask in common areas and proof of full vaccination. These measures apply to lawyers, staff, clients, service providers and other visitors.

Client Work

Williams v. Canon Canada Inc., 2011 ONSC 6571, aff’d 2012 ONSC 3692 (Div. Ct.)

Reading Time 1 minute read Subscribe



Canon Canada Inc. and Canon Inc.

Canon Canada Inc. and Canon Inc. ("Canon") successfully defeated the plaintiffs' appeal of a decision of the Superior Court of Justice refusing to certify a class action proposed on behalf of a class of owners of cameras manufactured by Canon. The Divisional Court found no error in the lower court's decision to strike the evidence of a "consumer product failure" expert proffered by the plaintiffs. The Divisional Court also found that the lower court did not err in finding that the plaintiffs had failed to satisfy the common issues portion of the test for certification. Canon was awarded its costs of the appeal in the amount of $40,000. Fasken Martineau acted as counsel to Canon with a team consisting of Paul Martin and Sarah Armstrong. Williams v. Canon Canada Inc., 2012 ONSC 3692 (CanLII)



    Receive email updates from our team