Client Work

Hôtel Clarendon Inc. wins its case and obtains confirmation of the validity of its right of first refusal to a building

Reading Time 1 minute read
Share

Overview

Client

Hotel Clarendon inc

On September 26, 2016, Hôtel Clarendon Inc. won its case and obtained confirmation of the validity of its right of first refusal to a building.

In Case no. 200-17-024029-167, the Superior Court recognized that Hôtel Clarendon Inc. had a right of first refusal which had been granted several years earlier and which was still valid despite (i) a corporate merger of the beneficiary, (ii) the sale of the beneficiary’s business and (iii) the transfer of the building by the debtor to an affiliated company.

A Fasken team made up of Dave Robitaille represented Hôtel Clarendon Inc. in this case. 

Jurisdiction

  • Québec

Team

  • Dave Robitaille, Partner | Commercial Litigation, Québec, QC, +1 418 640 2083, drobitaille@fasken.com
Dave Robitaille Québec Partner/Associé Dave Robitaille Partner | Commercial Litigation Québec, QC +1 418 640 2083

    You might be interested in...

    • Sandhu v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, 2016 BCSC 1077, 6/13/2016
    • Omarali v. Just Energy, 2016 ONSC 4094, 7/27/2016
    • Robertson House v. Canadian Union of Public Employees, [2016] C.L.A.D. No. 180, 7/4/2016
    Represented Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada Case Represented Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada Sandhu v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, 2016 BCSC 1077 ​Jonathan Lim acted as counsel for Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada in a BC Supreme Court summary judgment application before the Honourable Madam Justice Fisher. The Plaintiff sought various damages totaling $25 million. The action against Sun Life was dismissed with costs payable to Sun Life. Read more
    Represented Just Energy Inc. Case Represented Just Energy Inc. Omarali v. Just Energy, 2016 ONSC 4094 Read the decision: Omarali v. Just Energy, 2016 ONSC 4094 Read more
    Represented Robertson House Case Represented Robertson House Robertson House v. Canadian Union of Public Employees, [2016] C.L.A.D. No. 180 The Arbitrator upheld the termination of the Grievor for verbal and psychological abuse. The Grievor’s remorse that she was terminated was not the same as having remorse for what she did.  Read more