Skip to main content
Experience

Dismissal of an application for a safeguard order in a commercial lease dispute

Fasken
Reading Time 1 minute read
Share
  • LinkedIn

Overview

Fasken was successful in obtaining the dismissal of an application for a safeguard order in a commercial lease dispute.

Videri North Corporation entered into a commercial lease covering four premises that included an early termination clause. The lessor contested Videri’s reliance on the early termination clause and sought a safeguard order to (i) have the clause declared null and void, and (ii) compel payment of the rent.

The judge held that a safeguard order may only serve to preserve the balance between the parties and cannot operate as a disguised “pre-judgment seizure” or to obtain the relief that would otherwise be decided on the merits. For these reasons, the Court dismissed the application for a safeguard order.

A Fasken team that included Marc James Tacheji and Pierre Lantoin represented Videri North Corp. in this dispute.

 

Jurisdiction

  • Québec

Team

  • Marc James Tacheji, Partner | Litigation and Dispute Resolution, Montréal, QC, +1 514 397 5272, [email protected]
  • Pierre Lantoin, Associate | Litigation and Dispute Resolution, Montréal, QC, +1 514 397 5214, [email protected]
Marc James Tacheji Marc James Tacheji Partner | Litigation and Dispute Resolution Montréal, QC +1 514 397 5272
Pierre Lantoin, Associate | Litigation and Dispute Resolution Pierre Lantoin Associate | Litigation and Dispute Resolution Montréal, QC +1 514 397 5214